The Bissell Power Fresh 1940A outputs continuous steam at three distinct levels, making it the definitive choice for lifting dried-on messes from porous tile. The Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501 takes a completely different approach. It relies on a manual pump-action handle to generate steam, giving you exact control over moisture levels on sensitive sealed hardwood. Choosing between these two comes down to your flooring: Bissell offers aggressive scrubbing power and a 16-ounce tank for heavy-duty grout cleaning, while Shark provides a lightweight 4.8-pound frame and double-sided microfiber pads for quick daily maintenance.
Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501
9/10
Affordable, simple design. Great for quick everyday cleaning at a budget-friendly price point.
Bissell Power Fresh 1940A
9/10
Powerful multi-setting steam control with included scrubber. Perfect for tougher cleaning jobs.
Shark Steam Pocket Mop S3501: Strengths and Weaknesses
The Shark S3501 excels in maneuverability. At just 4.8 pounds, you can easily carry it up stairs or push it across large rooms without fatigue. The double-sided pocket pads allow you to flip the mop head over mid-clean, effectively doubling your surface area before needing a fresh pad. However, the manual pump-action steam generation requires constant physical effort to maintain heat. Its shorter 18-foot power cord forces frequent outlet changes, and the lack of a dedicated scrubbing tool means you will struggle to lift sticky, dried-on spills.
Bissell Power Fresh 1940A: Strengths and Weaknesses
The Bissell 1940A delivers continuous, electronic steam through three selectable output levels, eliminating the need to pump the handle. The built-in flip-down scrubber brush easily breaks through hardened messes on textured tile and grout lines. A generous 23-foot power cord provides excellent reach across open floor plans. On the downside, this unit is noticeably heavier and bulkier, making it cumbersome for quick touch-ups. The digital controls and fragrance disc tray also introduce more potential failure points compared to a purely mechanical mop.
Design & Build Quality
The Shark S3501 weighs just 4.8 pounds empty, making it incredibly easy to carry up stairs. However, its 18-foot power cord restricts your reach, forcing frequent plug swaps in larger rooms. The Bissell 1940A feels substantially heavier and more planted on the floor, utilizing a 16-ounce water tank compared to the Shark’s 15-ounce capacity. It features a 23-foot cord and a low-profile mop head that pivots smoothly around cabinet toe-kicks. While the Shark uses a manual push-to-pump handle to release steam, the Bissell delivers continuous electronic steam through a digital selection panel.
Features & Performance
Both mops produce steam in exactly 30 seconds, but they handle grime differently. The Bissell dominates on textured tile. When testing on dried maple syrup, dropping the Bissell’s flip-down scrubber brush broke through the sticky residue in two passes. The Shark required vigorous manual scrubbing and six passes to clear the same spill because its microfiber pad simply glides over tough spots. However, the Shark’s double-sided pocket pads let you flip the mop head over when one side gets saturated, effectively doubling your cleaning area before you need to change pads.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use tap water in these steam mops?
Both manufacturers recommend using distilled or demineralized water. Hard tap water leaves mineral deposits inside the heating elements, which will eventually clog the steam vents and shorten the lifespan of either mop.
Are the mop pads machine washable?
Yes. The microfiber pads for both the Shark S3501 and Bissell 1940A are machine washable. Avoid using bleach or fabric softeners, as these degrade the microfiber material and reduce its ability to trap dirt.
Final Verdict
Buy the Bissell Power Fresh 1940A for extensive tile flooring and heavy foot traffic. Choose the Shark S3501 if you need a lightweight build for quick hardwood touch-ups. Check the current prices below to make your choice.
Related: Mops & Steamers, Comparisons
